WFD Overall Lake Water Risk Score (2008)
Data Resources (2)
HTML
available as html
WMS
available as WMS
Data Resource Preview - WMS GetMap
Theme | Environment |
---|---|
Date released | 2008-01-01 |
Date updated | 2023-07-21 |
Dataset conforms to these standards | The INSPIRE Directive or INSPIRE lays down a general framework for a Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) for the purposes of European Community environmental policies and policies or activities which may have an impact on the environment. |
Rights notes | {"no limitations",https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/,license} |
Update frequency | Other |
Language | English |
Landing page | http://gis.epa.ie/geoserver/EPA/wms?service=WMS&version=1.1.0&request=GetMap&layers=EPA:WFD_LakewaterbodyRiskScore&styles=&bbox=33903.200000000186,25823.978800000623,321917.8128000004,445704.53580000065&width=526&height=768&srs=EPSG:29902&format=image%2Fpng |
Geographic coverage in GeoJSON format | {"type":"Polygon","coordinates":[[[-10.47472, 51.44555],[-10.47472, 55.37999], [-6.01306, 55.37999], [-6.01306, 51.44555], [-10.47472, 51.44555]]]} |
Spatial Reference Systems (SRS) | TM65 / Irish Grid (EPSG:29902) |
Vertical Extent | {"verticalDomainName": "EPSG Projection 5731 - Malin Head height", "minVerticalExtent": "0", "maxVerticalExtent": "1014"} |
Provenance information | The Water Framework Directive (WFD) Article 5 characterisation process requires an analysis of the pressures and impacts that human activities exert on Irish waters to be undertaken. The purpose of the analysis was to identify surface water bodies and groundwater bodies at risk of failing the objectives of the directive due to the effect of human activities. A number of tests were undertaken to determine whether the waterbody is going to achieve good status. These tests were carried out by RPS. Each waterbody was assigned a risk score for each test completed. For Ireland it was considered that use of four risk categories/scores (at significant risk (1a), probably at significant risk (1b), probably not at significant risk (2a) and not at significant risk (2b)) improved the prioritisation of follow-up actions and recognised the uncertainties associated with the analysis and/or datasets. If a waterbody was at risk for only one test the overall characterisation for that river was ‘At Risk’. Each record has the WFD European Code for the waterbody it refers to and a time stamp referring to the date that the risk status was compiled. |
Period of time covered (begin) | 2008-01-01 |
Period of time covered (end) | 2008-01-01 |